?

Log in

Previous Entry | Next Entry

UM.

First six paragraphs. Oh, so [the cop] had to look deep into her eyes to see that she's underage, and THIS is what you lead with, not the fact that [the cop] is looking at 42 images of a GIRL BEING RAPED. I mean, yay he found the girl to get her help. Yay he put the guy behind bars that had those pictures on his computer (may he piss off Schillinger the first day and be turned into a bitch.)

BOO to the freaking "journalist" that went for a sensational angle and LEAVING OUT THE RAPE PART UNTIL SIX PARAGRAPHS IN. (Seriously: this cop is awesome, the journalist should be smacked in the face. By his mother. On TV.)

In happy news, I've put another 5K into my (hopeful) book, I have seen a rough cut of my movie Blood on the Highway and it's going to be HILARIOUS, and I will have fudge in one hour. (When I get my butt in the kitchen and make it, rather.)

Tags:

Comments

( 16 comments — Leave a comment )
tabaqui
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:06 pm (UTC)
Okay, wtf? The girl's 'adult boyfriend' raped her? And she's still with the mother who, apparently, allowed this?
WTF.
*flails*

Dear gods. And yes - the journalist sucks balls.
stoney321
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:20 pm (UTC)
EXCELLENT POINT. One not raised. Great "reporting" there, dipwad!
tabaqui
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:36 pm (UTC)
No kidding.
Gah.
dovil
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:32 pm (UTC)
That's what raised my eyebrows as well, plus the fact that he's referred to as her 'boyfriend'? Please, the guys her abuser, not this kids boyfriend.

If the parents knowingly allowed this adult to have a relationship with their child they need to have social services dragged in stat.
tabaqui
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:35 pm (UTC)
Exactly. I mean - YUCK. Boyfriend my ass. Was he the one who abused her at 12, too?

Sheesh.
lynnenne
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:14 pm (UTC)
So I guess if she had been a legal adult, it would have been okay to rape her. *eyeroll*
stoney321
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:19 pm (UTC)
YES!! That's the only conclusion you can make from the IDIOT writer. Good hell.
lynnenne
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:22 pm (UTC)
Hahahaha. Your icon makes me forget the stupidity.
stoney321
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:43 pm (UTC)
AFFLACK. (I always want to say AFFLECK and have it be Ben showing up randomly. *g*)
southernbangel
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:15 pm (UTC)
What the ever bleedin' hell?!? I'd say that photos showing a girl being RAPED are more than "sexually explicit photos." If I didn't know better, I would think that, based on the phrase "sexually explicit", the pictures were more of the teenager posing nude or something. Not, you know, BEING RAPED.

The police officer? Awesome. That journalist? Made of FAIL.

(I would like some fudge in my belly now, kthanx.)
stoney321
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:20 pm (UTC)
See, reading that, I was thinking the same thing: he found some dirty Girls Gone Wild type pics. OH HELLO 12 YEAR OLD BEING RAPED. WHat.

(I will fwoomp some to you ASAP)
gillo
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:27 pm (UTC)
She didn't look underage? So it was Ok to rape her then?

Twelve-year-olds can look pretty mature these days - but old enough for sex? I don't think so.

The article says far more about the priorities of the journalist than about the crime. But then, rape only happens to girls. Who whine a lot. So it obviously doesn't matter.
stoney321
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:43 pm (UTC)
YEAH! What the WHAT?!?!

You're spot on re: the priorities of the journalist. Shame on him.
a2zmom
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:38 pm (UTC)
This whole story doesn't make any sense. Did her parants know about this. Was this girl willingly going to this man? This is so poorly reported that I want to scream.
stoney321
Dec. 1st, 2007 11:44 pm (UTC)
Poorly reported.

Every. Single. Paragraph. Please note that they have a "Viewpoint" apologizing to the public about their poor grammar skills. UM, HELLO, HUH?!
bitchygrrl
Dec. 2nd, 2007 04:09 pm (UTC)
What? The? Hell?
( 16 comments — Leave a comment )

Tags

Are You Actually

Reading this? I'm just curious. Because that's really detail-oriented of you. Feel free to stop reading. But you can see that there's more here, so are you going to keep reading? Really? That's pretty dedicated. I'm impressed. No, really. I'm not being sarcastic, why do you get like that? See, this is the problem I have with your mother - yes. YES. I'm going there. It's time we put all of our cards on the table.

I love you, why are you doing this? After all we've been through? You don't have to be like this. You know, still reading. You could be baking a pie. And then sharing it with me.

Time Wot It Is

April 2017
S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      
Powered by LiveJournal.com